BALOCHISTAN UNFOLDED

It seems that in the confines of history, ever since the age of dawn, it has been human nature to be power hungry and do all you can to crush your enemies. Many examples have arisen throughout the years, and battles and constant struggles follow in the wake of such motives. One such case is of Pakistan and India. A fierce rivalry bringing with it a long history of killings, attacks and schemes. Although many incidents can be found in the recent years of the tension between the two countries, it has been going on since the time of partition. To properly understand the issue, a basic background should be in order. The reason why the British decided to separate the great subcontinent was to give the two major religions ‘Muslims and Hindus’, in its space a definite homeland. All the princely states were given freedom to choose with whom they should side. The concept of Pakistan and India had already arisen with many princely states having picked one side due to various reasons, be it the majority of the community living in the state or the religion that the ruler practiced. A propaganda has recently been unveiled by India that Balochistan which is the biggest province in Pakistan wished to stay independent and not be a part of Pakistan and was forced to accede through the barrel of the gun, and that the Pakistani Army surrounded the province and killed all who dared to wish for an independent state. There has been a widespread campaign on this with India chiming in the multiple reasons on how Pakistan is oppressing the rights of the Balochi’s living in the province. This has been backed up by a barrage of accounts claiming to be from Balochistan or its surrounding areas verifying the claims that the Indian government has made. The actions of Baramdagh Bugti didn’t make it any easier on the Pakistani government. Although evidence has been found against India for promoting him, but he still remains unchallenged. Since India are Hell bent to somehow get some sort of edge over its fierce neighbor, they have stopped at nothing to try and gain the sympathy of the world following the URI attack which they blamed on Pakistan without a second thought or any sort of evidence. Going back to the reason why India are so fixated about getting a free Balochistan. According to the information they are sharing, Balochistan acceded through force to Pakistan and thus should be considered independent as times have changed. And they are basing the current situation of some few personalities on the internet who claim to be oppressed by “being a part of Pakistan” (quoted). Although these personalities remain discreet and have no real influence on the matter, India has taken it upon itself to address the overall picture. In truth, the facts spewed by the Indian government and also the in question personalities need to get their facts straight.

First of all, it wasn’t even Balochistan that acceded as a whole state, it was Kalat. Kalat was a separate state which only came under a portion of Balochistan separate of Quetta or any other major city. Although the ruler of Kalat at the time known as the Khan of Kalat owned several areas around his territory, he did not own or control all of Balochistan. Secondly the theme that the ruler was forced to accede under the barrel of the gun couldn’t be farther from the truth. The Khan of Kalat held talks and dialogues with the founder of Pakistan Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and agreed on mutual consent to be a part of Pakistan. This has been documented by the British and quoted by many Balochi leaders as to say it all happened with free will and no guns or threats were involved. Lastly, the Pakistani army did stand outside the border of Kalat but for a completely different reason. Sometime after the Khan had agreed to join his lands with Pakistan, his younger brother ‘Abdul Karim’ who was not in favor of joining Pakistan and dreamed of his own independent state rebelled against his older brother to forcefully take over the throne. To stop this mutiny, the Khan requested the Pakistani Army to intervene and they did. Abdul Karim with his small band of militants took up arms against the army but surrendered when they saw that they stood no chance. The Pakistani Army calmed the situation down without any major casualty and Abdul Karim was exiled to Afghanistan.

With the rebellion under control and the community along with the Khan considerably happy, Pakistan as a strong independent nation was strengthened with the inclusion of Kalat into its borders. Regarding these facts, India does not even have an argument over Balochistan and for those personalities that do not even hail from the province have no right to claim and spread lies that apparently have no connection with them. For the people or rather Indians that are still obsessed with breaking apart Pakistan, look at the history of your states. I hope reading about the accession of Jodhpur, Jaisalmer and Junagarh will calm you down. If that doesn’t help and you still think a case stands on Balochistan, look up what you did to Hyderabad and its people. Your very own Pundit Sunderlal’s report is there as proof.

Read More

PAK v IND dying out

Threats have come from India’s side that they are planning a war against Pakistan for the so called planned attack on Uri base this September by Pakistani militants according to India. The Indians claimed and gave a knee jerk reaction even while the base was under attack that it must be Pakistan who sent these agents into battle to weaken the Indian forces. Firstly, as documented and reported by a retired Indian major, India had placed around 300,000 army troops placed at the line of control. So for four militants to cross undetected through to the Indian side from Pakistan is a huge slap across the face of the Indians themselves who pride their army for being one of the world’s best. India might have calmed down on wanting an outright war since no actual evidence has come forth that Pakistan were the ones behind the attack and since they have no real proof on this notion, they have backed off somewhat on their need for a war especially with both powers being nuclear capable and having a huge ammunition on their hands.

Pakistan on the other hand never wanted a war but a trend as started by youths and social activists in Pakistan showed the Indians that Pakistan were going to be no easy pushovers due to everyone getting ready to fight for its safety. This was so much widespread and the trend flamed into such a huge number that even PM of India, Modi changed the stance of the overall country by stating that India will not go for an all-out war but would rather do it through stopping the water and trying to spread unrest in Pakistan through social media.

Besides the uprising of the Pakistani fightback on social media, many Pakistani leaders are also chiming up the retaliation on their press releases and conferences. Jamaat-e-Islami Chief Sirajul Haq said on Saturday that India is creating war hysteria to divert the world’s attention from its atrocities in Kashmir but also added that in case of war, New Delhi would face a Pakistan which is a thousand times stronger than it was in 1965.

Read More

hyderabad before and after the fall, a short summary

 Hyderabad was once a proud Muslim state, owned by Muslims rulers and had no complaint whatsoever from their ruling even by Hindu communities. Everything went on according to the way it should have and no community or religion was targeted in any sort of biasness. In the incident where British rule was the situation, they allowed the king’s family to stay where he was and operate on how he wished but to still be in accordance with them on notifying major decisions and even at that time, nothing actually changed.

The change actually took place when the concept of democracy was introduced. The leaders of India were all for the notion of creating the best nation they could which included area and people. Even though Hyderabad was a Muslim owned area, the Indian government tried to persuade the ruler of Hyderabad to join its nation. Hyderabad preferred to stay independent or to join Pakistan but India was having none of that. To allow such a huge region to unite with it’s soon to be enemies or another threat to its overall plan was not to be tolerated. 50000 murders later, India had a firm grasp on Hyderabad. They accomplished this by forcing the wealthy Muslims out of the area and the poor ones to work as slaves or perish. As for the ones that opposed, they were either tortured or worse, put to death. This included women and small children who were brutally killed.

According to a report issued by Sunderlal, he discovered that most Muslim dominated areas had been cleared out with only corpses as the remains while the ones that were of Hindu majority remained unscathed. Such is the tragedy of this mutiny to the ruling family and the thirst for power of the Indians that they forced the local Hindus to join in the killings and they did so.

Read More

Indias Worsening army condition

But there is another, less obvious reason for reticence. India is not as strong militarily as the numbers might suggest. Puzzlingly, given how its international ambitions are growing along with its economy, and how alarming its strategic position looks, India has proved strangely unable to build serious military muscle.

India’s armed forces look good on paper. It fields the world’s second-biggest standing army, after China, with long fighting experience in a variety of terrains and situations. It has topped the list of global arms importers since 2010, sucking in a formidable array of top-of-the-line weaponry, including Russian warplanes, Israeli missiles, American transport aircraft and French submarines. State-owned Indian firms churn out some impressive gear, too, including fighter jets, cruise missiles and the 40,000-tonne aircraft-carrier under construction in a shipyard in Kochi, in the south of the country.

Yet there are serious chinks in India’s armor. Much of its weaponry is, in fact, outdated or ill maintained. “Our air defense is in a shocking state,” says Ajai Shukla, a commentator on military affairs. “What’s in place is mostly 1970s vintage, and it may take ten years to install the fancy new gear.” On paper, India’s air force is the world’s fourth largest, with around 2,000 aircraft in service. But an internal report seen in 2014 by IHS Jane’s, a defense publication, revealed that only 60% were typically fit to fly. A report earlier this year by a government accounting agency estimated that the “serviceability” of the 45 MiG 29K jets that are the pride of the Indian navy’s air arm ranged between 16% and 38%. They were intended to fly from the carrier currently under construction, which was ordered more than 15 years ago and was meant to have been launched in 2010. According to the government’s auditors the ship, after some 1,150 modifications, now looks unlikely to sail before 2023.

Such delays are far from unusual. India’s army, for instance, has been seeking a new standard assault rifle since 1982; torn between demands for local production and the temptation of fancy imports, and between doctrines calling for heavier firepower or more versatility, it has flip-flopped ever since. India’s air force has spent 16 years perusing fighter aircraft to replace ageing Soviet-era models. By demanding over-ambitious specifications, bargain prices, hard-to-meet local-content quotas and so on, it has left foreign manufacturers “banging heads against the wall”, in the words of one Indian military analyst. Four years ago France appeared to have clinched a deal to sell 126 of its Rafale fighters. The order has since been whittled to 36, but is at least about to be finalized.

India’s military is also scandal-prone. Corruption has been a problem in the past, and observers rightly wonder how guerrillas manage to penetrate heavily guarded bases repeatedly. Lately the Indian public has been treated to legal battles between generals over promotions, loud disputes over pay and orders for officers to lose weight. In July a military transport plane vanished into the Bay of Bengal with 29 people aboard; no trace of it has been found. In August an Australian newspaper leaked extensive technical details of India’s new French submarines.

The deeper problem with India’s military is structural. The three services are each reasonably competent, say security experts; the trouble is that they function as separate fiefdoms. “No service talks to the others, and the civilians in the Ministry of Defense don’t talk to them,” says Mr Shukla. Bizarrely, there are no military men inside the ministry at all. Like India’s other ministries, defence is run by rotating civil servants and political appointees more focused on ballot boxes than ballistics. “They seem to think a general practitioner can perform surgery,” says Abhijit Iyer-Mitra, who has worked as a consultant for the ministry. Despite their growing brawn, India’s armed forces still lack a brain.

Read More

India v china+pakistan

To many Indians, their country’s strategic position looks alarming. Its two biggest neighbors are China and Pakistan. It has fought wars with both, and border issues still fester. Both are nuclear-armed, and are allies with one another to boot. China, a rising superpower with five times India’s GDP, is quietly encroaching on India’s traditional sphere of influence, tying a “string of pearls” of alliances around the subcontinent. Relatively weak but safe behind its nuclear shield, Pakistan harbors Islamist guerrillas who have repeatedly struck Indian targets; regional security wonks have long feared that another such incident might spark a conflagration, reports the Economist.

So when four heavily armed infiltrators attacked an Indian army base on September 18, killing 18 soldiers before being shot dead themselves, jitters inevitably spread. The base nestles in mountains close to the “Line of Control”, as the border between the Indian and Pakistani-administered parts of the disputed territory of Kashmir is known. Indian officials reflexively blamed Pakistan; politicians and pundits vied in demanding a punchy response. “Every Pakistan post through which infiltration takes place should be reduced to rubble by artillery fire,” blustered a retired brigadier who now mans a think-tank in New Delhi, India’s capital.

Yet despite electoral promises to be tough on Pakistan, the Hindu-nationalist government of Narendra Modi has trodden as softly as its predecessors. On September 21 it summoned Pakistan’s envoy for a wrist-slap, citing evidence that the attackers had indeed slipped across the border, and noting that India has stopped 17 such incursions since the beginning of the year. Much to the chagrin of India’s armchair warriors, such polite reprimands are likely to be the limit of India’s response.

There are good reasons for this. India gains diplomatic stature by behaving more responsibly than Pakistan. It is keenly aware of the danger of nuclear escalation, and of the risks of brinkmanship to its economy. Indian intelligence agencies also understand that they face an unusual adversary in Pakistan: such is its political frailty that any Indian belligerence tends to strengthen exactly the elements in Pakistan’s power structure that are most inimical to India’s own interests.

Read More

India's Poverty Struggle

Modi in his latest press release targeted the pakistani youth for their excessive fight back on social media to fend of the indian uprising on the same platform. he stated that the youth of pakistan should worry about other things rather than focusing on india and its current status. he challenged the Pakistanis in an indirect competition labeling Pakistan on a worse position as compared to india on Employment, lifestyle and poverty issues. Modi started out with war cries towards Pakistan but then quieted down and urged the people of Pakistan that they need to work together to create a better living for both the countries. although there have been no updates on the war alert, for now india seemed to have realized that they are facing an opponent they would not want to mess with because of the huge number of pakistanis ready to back our army in case of an all out war. Modi reconciled to this fact and eased his ego just a little to discuss some other serious issues and although he did give up in the war challenge, he egged the Pakistanis to fight his own kind of war. a war between the two countries against Poverty. according to his game, the winner will be one who eradicates poverty from their country first. this might be hard to do because the world bank has shown that india leads pakistan with a population of 20.9 percent people under the poverty line whereas pakistan has only 8.3 people under the poverty line. although this itself is a large number in pakistan, india has a population three times of that in pakistan which makes its total all the more tough to deal with. so unless modi has superpowers or a plan of action that will actually work, it is impossible to see how he can come up with a solution that would make him the victor of this challenge.

Read More

current events

Looking at all the allegations against Pakistan in the last few days at the UNGA, mostly spouted by Indians, we can conclude one thing that it does not even want to promote peace but to promote the banishment of Pakistan. They say that they are not abusing Kashmiris and Pakistan should look towards Balochistan is one of the lamest excuses ever to say that they are deflecting from the original issue. Their own army generals are disregarding the fact that the URI attack was originated from the Pakistani side and are assuring to the Indian government that this was staged and now that India has lost this small social skirmish and one of the most worked upon campaigns, they shift to Balochistan as an alternative. How stupid are they to think anyone would believe them when they change stances so quickly. They say it is all Pakistan’s doing, yet they have been the ones that have been completely exposed for the false flags they have raised and for the covert operations they have thrown towards Pakistan. Both the issues of Pathankot and Uri were confirmed attack sites and this is something that everyone in the world agrees on but the fact that they were from a Pakistani source is completely made up and imagined by the Indian government, who give out various statements about proof of Pakistani labelled items on the possession of the infiltrators as if that condemns them to be from Pakistan.

The truth of the matter is that India itself is sponsoring and creating these terrorists. May it be in India or Pakistan? This is staged by India and it is done to deface Pakistan of the peaceful and great nation that it is. All they need is a reason to try and make Pakistan look bad and they go for it and raise issues that don’t even exist. The latest of these issues have been the Balochistan one where India has laid claims that Balochistan is trying to separate from Pakistan which is completely untrue. They base this on some social media accounts that have popped up recently saying that they want to leave Pakistan and be independent and what’s more is that they want Indian help in doing so. This would have been serious if those people had actually existed but the fact of the matter is that the people on social media that apparently want Balochistan to be free are not even from Pakistan. Isn’t it strange how they went to India for help the very time they popped up after 69 years of living in peace and happiness? This lie was uncovered when the former federal minister of trade and communications Prince Mohyuddin Baloch stated that there was no such occurrence of anyone wanting to separate from Pakistan.

India might be stating itself as a peaceful nation but the fact of the matter is that India itself is in deep trouble with this issue as well. Yet they hide their own mistakes and publicize Pakistan as being the one which is crumbling. Yet, even if the Indian Government is happy with the current situation, its people are not and are throwing loads of complaints into the governments face. If India truly describes itself as a successful nation, they how come its main concern is to deface Pakistan and not to fix itself up first.

To all those reading this, please think, is this nation truly great or just trying to shift attention from its own problems to others.

Read More

Kalat Truth Revealed

In a statement issued here, he said, Baloch people and leadership played a pivotal role during Pakistan movement and rendered unmatched sacrifices for solidarity and integrity of their motherland.

Referring to statements of some Indian politicians regarding Balochistan, he said,there were solid evidences of Indian involvement in Balochistan affairs, adding, now Indian leadership was again interfering in the internal matters of Balochistan to divert attention of its aggression in occupied Kashmir.

Highlighting the history of sacrifices by Balochs for Pakistan, he said, Khan of Kalat hosted father of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Mohtarma Fatima Jinnah during independence movement.

Later, Khan of Kalat voluntarily announced to merge Kalat state in Pakistan on the eve of independence in a bid to further strengthen the new state.

He said, Baloch people were patriot and supported all the efforts being made to Pakistan a developed and prosperous state.

Prince Mohyuddin Baloch offered that he would continue to work for betterment of Balochistan and make effort to unite the Baloch nation on the platform of BRIT.

He said, Baloch youth should be imparted technical training so that they could get appropriate jobs in the projects being implemented under China-Pakistan Economic

Corridor (CPEC).

Read More

History of hyderabad

When India was partitioned in 1947, about 500,000 people died in communal rioting, mainly along the borders with Pakistan. But a year later another massacre occurred in central India, which until now has remained clouded in secrecy.

In September and October 1948, soon after independence from the British Empire, tens of thousands of people were brutally slaughtered in central India.

Some were lined up and shot by Indian Army soldiers. Yet a government-commissioned report into what happened was never published and few in India know about the massacre. Critics have accused successive Indian governments of continuing a cover-up.

The massacres took place a year after the violence of partition in what was then Hyderabad state, in the heart of India. It was one of 500 princely states that had enjoyed autonomy under British colonial rule.

When independence came in 1947 nearly all of these states agreed to become part of India.

But Hyderabad's Muslim Nizam, or prince, insisted on remaining independent. This refusal to surrender sovereignty to the new democratic India outraged the country's leaders in New Delhi.

After an acrimonious stand-off between Delhi and Hyderabad, the government finally lost patience.

Historians say their desire to prevent an independent Muslim-led state taking root in the heart of predominantly Hindu India was another worry.

Members of the powerful Razakar militia, the armed wing of Hyderabad's most powerful Muslim political party, were terrorizing many Hindu villagers.

This gave the Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, the pretext he needed. In September 1948 the Indian Army invaded Hyderabad.

In what was rather misleadingly known as a "police action", the Nizam's forces were defeated after just a few days without any significant loss of civilian lives. But word then reached Delhi that arson, looting and the mass murder and rape of Muslims had followed the invasion.

The details of this uncovered truth can be found in pundit sunderlal's report that was recently made public.

Read More

operation Poomalai

There has been widespread news over what the current situation of the ever growing conflict between India and Pakistan has gotten into. India as always is using tactics from behind the scenes in the form of covert operations to exclude itself from any frontal damage to its image. By creating and supporting organizations that are not directly linked with them but working for their despicable goals is an example. Such is the case of TTP. Tehreek e Taliban Pakistan as an independent organization cannot do much and is soon to be crushed due to operation zarb e azab but the ones trying to promote the idea of TTP are actually India. This is not the first time India has aided the terrorists. On June 1987, when there were skirmishes going on between srilanka and the group of terrorists known as the Tamil tigers, India used its air force resources to aid the infiltrators and directly help them. After the first few drops that were unsuccessful, they finally managed to get the packages to the intended targets. Read full story here:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Poomalai

This is exactly what India is doing now. Raising up a false flag to rally the UN and other external parties against Pakistan. Aiding its terrorists with their own money just to give Pakistan a bad name and on top of that making situation in Kashmir much worse for the locals. They do not have any right to mourn over their own that they themselves killed. The only right they have is to accept that they would stoop so low as to even kill off their own men. Although the claims are against Pakistan and they have started threatening skirmishes and replies back to Pakistan as a way of defending themselves, they are yet to prove in any way if Pakistan is actually behind this attack. But as history has repeated itself, the proof is in front of everyone’s eyes, India has supported terrorists before to destabilize a nation for its own advantage and it is doing so again. With all the allegations against the infamous RAW organization, no one would be surprised if India did not step up its game and kill its own men just to divert the attention of the world powers from its own atrocities for a fake cry of help.

Read More

forceful takeover

All we see on the media these days is how Pakistan occupied Balochistan forcefully or how Pakistan has no right over Kashmir and every other post from Indian media targets the fact that Pakistani are basically abusing their rights to capture other states that do not want to be a part of them. They have the following things to base this on. They think that the ruler of the state does not want this. This is not the case in POK, neither was it in Balochistan. They think the people are unhappy with Pakistani treatment on their area. Neither the Balochi people come forward in hopes to extract some sort of revenge against Pakistan nor is the only thing Pakistani Kashmiris feel about the government when it will stop the Indian army from destroying their lives.

But if India really does want to fight this game, then Pakistan has a few options it can use as well. Junagarh,Jodhpur, Jaisalmer, rajahs tan and not to mention Hyderabad are all examples of what India claims went wrong with Balochistan. All four of the above mentioned states do not make the total princely states that wanted nothing to do with India but were forced to do so by the Indian Army. With Muslim leaders or Muslim majority, each of these states were adamant on joining with Pakistan or staying independent but by no means whatsoever being a part of India. But India did not have the intention of letting any state with potential go to Pakistan or away from its grasp. They quickly pounced on it and tried to dominate and force the residents and rulers to either succumb to the pressure or kill them in the process. Most of the times, Muslim lives were at stake with 90% of the deaths in these forceful take overs being Muslims. And these days, India is trying ever so hard to take over Kashmir using brute force. More than 80 Muslims have perished from what is called police action. 80 lives are not a small matter are they?

Read More

Khan of Kalat- The Story

Once upon a time of partition lived a king and a ruler of a great princely state known as Kalat. He was very happy and a very boisterous man. He lived as a Muslim and did what a great ruler should do and cared for his people as much as a king should treat his subjects. He remained steadfast in the time of partition and thought of the options he had. He could either side up with India, side up with Pakistan or become an independent state. Now India was on the other side of the Sindh province and Kalat would have no contact or dealing with it what so ever and besides, it was India ruled that option out of the question. The Khan of Kalat respected Jinnah as did Jinnah respect the Khan. After a few talks, accession of Kalat to Pakistan was decided and that was that. Kalat is a small region just south of Quetta making up for about 20% of the total Balochistan area but was still a princely state that gave the utmost importance to not let die off so Jinnah held talks with the Khan and peaceful accession was arranged. The outcome of the whole situation should have resolved then but unfortunately for both parties, it did not. Outraged by his elder brother’s decision, the younger brother of the Khan of Kalat “Abdul Karim khan” who sought out his own personal dream of getting an independent state for himself where he would rule above all rebelled. It was a fight to take control of his brothers lands as well as from Pakistani accession but his brother, the khan was against it and sought help from the Pakistani army to stop the rebellion inside. The younger brother of the khan could not mount such and imposing army as his followers were small in number and those who fought alongside him did not share his dream. When they saw that the Pakistani army had accumulated outside the borders of Kalat and were ready to aid the Khan to stop the rebellion, the uprising in the Kalat area came to a standstill without any sufficient bloodshed. The region turned into peace and all became happy with the accession and those under the younger brother accepted Kalat as a part of Pakistan. The younger brother himself “Abdul Karim was exiled to Afghanistan and therefor the issue was resolved. Thus Pakistan gained a valuable asset and the people of Kalat gained new brothers.

Read More

PEACE IN BALOCHISTAN

Balochistan is a peaceful area. All of the people especially in the capital are nice and friendly towards one another and although they might hold some sort of grudge for the government. They would never want to leave Pakistan. Our country might be facing a lot of problems and would be in a lot of trouble but this in no way would ever get us to feel any less proud to be a Pakistani. Ask any one from the anywhere in the country and they would say that they are proud to be a Pakistani. Ask people the reason and they would say that we belong from Pakistan and that would be it. The culture and trend in the world especially in Pakistan is that only the bad and negative things get highlighted whereas the positives remain hidden. Pakistan is a beautiful country with lots of potential and this is to be highlighted. It has so many beautiful areas, is abundant in natural resources and the landscape is brilliant but for some reason, the only thing that gets highlighted is the corruption and the attacks. Pakistan is in trouble but that does not mean that we should only highlight the one thing that would give Pakistan a bad name. This is what external parties thrive on. They find something they can use against us and expend it to the fullest which in avertedly brings us down. No one cares to highlight the good things and especially in the case of Pakistan. Neither our media is trying to convey a positive message nor does the external media show Pakistan for what it truly is. A beautiful land with great people. In the case of Balochistan, so many allegations were put forward that they do not wish to remain a part of Pakistan anymore and that the ruler of the current Kalat region is still attempting to gain freedom by talking to the British from his residence in the UK. This might be one man’s dream although he has to face that Kalat is the only place he can speak for and not the whole of Balochistan. Thus, for the government and the people that wish for Balochistan to remain an integral part of Pakistan, they should very well raise their voices and let themselves be heard. Balochistan is ours and we would not let it go.

Read More

Real stroy behind balochistan scandal

One thing we hear in the news these days is that Pakistan army infiltrated the region of Balochistan and forcefully took over its area and forced it to accede to Pakistan on the barrel of the gun. This is all a giant propaganda spread by Indian forces who would want nothing but to spread our resources and break us apart. The fact of the matter is that Balochistan was never infiltrated. It wasn’t Balochistan that was forced to accept. Balochistan wasn’t even a whole princely state at the time but divided into many little states from which one was KALAT. That is the area or state that holds the history so many of the Indians are trying to highlight. They do not reveal the real occurrence that happened and only the things that benefit them. Most of the lies they tell us are about how the Pakistan army forced its way into Balochistan borders and took control of the area by forcing its head to join Pakistan against his will and that the atrocities against the ruler should be base for the Balochi people to react. This is all absurd. The history has been manipulated in a way favorable to all Indians as they want to weaken Pakistan as a nation. They hate us and we hate them. It is an absolute law that has been passed on since independence. We fight with them and they fight with us but the way they spread lies about our country and its history is absolute horrific. India is scared of us, of our growing power. They doubt that they can handle whatever Pakistan can dish out. We might be smaller in size and smaller in population but that is not something that will guarantee victory to them. We have already shown them that we are not that weak to get crumbled by this onslaught. Neither are we about to let this die without letting people know the truth. It wasn’t Balochistan. Only Kalat state was the one that people claim to be all of Balochistan. It wasn’t even quarter of the size of the province and India seem to be uttering the rubbish that all of Balochistan was involved. This shows the absolute nonsense that they spout.

Read More

STRONG FEEL FOR PAKISTAN

The main thing to be considered now is what the media is trying to convey in terms of Balochistan, why India is trying too hard to free a nation that doesn’t want freedom. Why so many Indian social activists are making a campaign out of something that should not exist. All of these actions are created and caused by Pakistan and the unrest is because of Pakistan’s weakness but it does not mean that we sit and do nothing about it. So many fake accounts are rising up and supposedly all from oppressed Balochistan claiming that they are not treated fairly and the way they should be. All done without research, the people don’t even exist. And yet, they are creating a pull. This is the sort of stuff that we as Pakistanis need to stick together. We are a strong nation but we are accepting the stupidity that they are feeding us. No one should believe that Balochistan are trying to get independent. Yes, there can be a few people who feel strongly about what happened more than 69 years ago. But why would they try to separate from Pakistan. This issue has never been raised before, nor has a rapid attention come from India at any time except this. This is all a ploy. Wake up people of Pakistan. Do you think we are so dumb to not notice what India wants as a nation. They wanted to take Kashmir from us and have been trying ever since independence, but have failed. Now they are trying the same with Balochistan and we are not doing anything about it as a nation. All of us talk crap about our politicians and leaders and yet we leave the important decisions to them as if they are the only ones that should do something about it. This is why India is leading as a state over us and we are not doing anything. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS.  As a nation, it is our duty to keep our integrity. We cannot just keep relying on the US to support our cause and celebrate it like we had just won everything. Do we think the forces behind this will stop by one defeat to them? They will keep on going and we as a nation can take this. We can handle anything they throw at us and we will fight back and win.

Read More

the real plan of India

There has been widespread news over what the current situation of the ever growing conflict between India and Pakistan has gotten into. India as always is using tactics from behind the scenes in the form of covert operations to exclude itself from any frontal damage to its image. By creating and supporting organizations that are not directly linked with them but working for their despicable goals is an example. Such is the case of TTP. Tehreek e Taliban Pakistan as an independent organization cannot do much and is soon to be crushed due to operation zarb e azab but the ones trying to promote the idea of TTP are actually India. This is not the first time India has aided the terrorists. On June 1987, when there were skirmishes going on between srilanka and the group of terrorists known as the Tamil tigers, India used its air force resources to aid the infiltrators and directly help them. After the first few drops that were unsuccessful, they finally managed to get the packages to the intended targets. Read full story here:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Poomalai

This is exactly what India is doing now. Raising up a false flag to rally the UN and other external parties against Pakistan. Aiding its terrorists with their own money just to give Pakistan a bad name and on top of that making situation in Kashmir much worse for the locals. They do not have any right to mourn over their own that they themselves killed. The only right they have is to accept that they would stoop so low as to even kill off their own men. Although the claims are against Pakistan and they have started threatening skirmishes and replies back to Pakistan as a way of defending themselves, they are yet to prove in any way if Pakistan is actually behind this attack. But as history has repeated itself, the proof is in front of everyone’s eyes, India has supported terrorists before to destabilize a nation for its own advantage and it is doing so again. With all the allegations against the infamous RAW organization, no one would be surprised if India did not step up its game and kill its own men just to divert the attention of the world powers from its own atrocities for a fake cry of help.

Read More

Uri killings all a false flag

 The latest news travelling around the Uri attacks is that it was all orchestrated by the Indian government themselves. The term #falseflagbeforeun has gone viral on twitter and Facebook with posts coming from everywhere about India sabotaging its own army soldiers operations to promote awareness for Pakistani centered terrorists which do not exist. The concept of false flag is a simple but diabolic one. To sometimes spread a rumor or mostly done to unite your troops under one flag against a greater enemy, a rumor is spread about an occurrence which did happen but within the said parties own powers. The operation in question is said to be the work of the opposing party and thus unity and a general idea accepted by all is promoted. Usually, a very effective way to get into the minds of friends and foes alike, false flag was made common by United States of America when they used the same tactic to go against Cuba’s retaliation.

India in this situation has done the exactly same thing, while promoting Pakistan as the homeland of all terrorists, used 4 unnamed personnel attacked an Indian army base camp settled somewhere near the line of control and managed to kill of 17 young soldiers on duty at that time. The Indian government has wildly claimed that this was the work of Pakistani terrorists who managed to infiltrate and Indian guarded border along with killing more than quadruple their strength. This may have happened but the only proof that the Indians have given is a video in which they claim to have laid down some items which had Pakistani markings on them. The video has no such evidence and even if it did would not guarantee that they were actually Pakistani.

The false flag in question would be the work of India’s government who would need to make up reasons to put the blame on Pakistan. And lately, anything which causes damage seems to have Pakistan written on it. This is definitely a ploy to get the attention from innocent killings in Kashmir to shift towards the Indian army personnel. And for those that hate Pakistani people for an attack that they do not commit, they should look at the daily killing of children and innocent bystanders who were brutally killed and wounded by the Indian army. Is this justice?

Read More

THE REAL STORY BEHIND URI ATTACK!!!

On September 18^th 2016, around half past 5 in the morning, four armed and highly skilled men infiltrated the army camp of the Indian forces at Uri and managed to kill 17 Indian personnel and succeeded in wounding several others. Although all four of them were later killed by the army, they had achieved what was probably the gist of their mission. So with heavy losses incurred and no way to identify who the unnamed attackers were, the mike was passed on to Indian DGMO lt Gen Ranbhir Singh who laid out the claim that the items they were carrying had Pakistani markings on them labelling this as a Pakistani orchestrated move.

Although there have been report and claims by many stating that Pakistan were at fault or pulling the strings, there is no clear evidence that this is to be true. The three points that have come up are;

1.    That the terrorists crossed from the Pakistani side to the Indian side, thus must be Pakistani.

2.    They had items which had Pakistani markings on them, thus they must be Pakistani.

3.    They attacked an Indian army base camp, thus they must be Pakistani.

Overall, looking at this evidence clearly shows that India has carried out a strong investigation and achieved at the logical solution that Pakistan were involved in all of this. By looking at the referencing that the Indians are using, if Pakistan is labelled as a terrorist state just because of a few attacks that happen inside its borders, shouldn’t India be given the same title then? This should be a lesson to the Indian government to stop giving knee jerk reactions to every other thing and always claiming out Pakistan as the wrong doer.

Read More

Updating Kashmir Issue

Around 70 straight days of oppression have been concluded in Kashmir with no hope for a solution on the horizon. On this Thursday 15^th Sep, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra ad Al Hussein said an international probe was needed crucially in Kashmir though India hit back saying that violence was choreographed from across the border. India was adamant at its stance of Kashmir being one entity and belonging as a whole to India. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights wants to send a delegation over to both sides of the Line of Control to verify the situation. Whereas Pakistan has readily accepted the invitation for the visit, India is hesitant and are not in favor of any sort of visit from Hussein’s team. Hussein states that he has heard and read reports on unrest on the Indian side with more than 80 deaths occurring already in the past few days. “I believe an independent impartial and international mission is now needed crucially and that it should be given free and complete access to establish an objective assessment of the claims made by the two sides,” Hussein said, adding that while Pakistan had acceded to his request for a visit to its side, India had yet to do so.

Pakistan as it stands supports the visit of an OHCHR team according to the Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations on Human Rights Ambassador Tehmina Janjua. Now with India claiming of rising terrorism in Kashmir and have taken the right of freedom call of now martyred Burhan Wani for whom more than 200,000 supporters showed up at his funeral, as a war cry of terrorists trying to claim Kashmir for themselves, they look to oppress Muslims living in India using pellet guns and force to Make their lives a torture chamber. So if this force is absolutely necessary to obtain peace, shooting pellets into innocent eyes is the new way of keeping law and order for the Indian Government.

Read More

Sit Rep on Balochistan

India dealt major blow:

Modi tried to up the propaganda game on Balochistan by appealing to the U.S last month with same allegations of Pakistani army violating the human rights of Balochi people. He made claims about an independent Balochistan and what was obviously a ploy to cut the main chunk of Pakistan into an independent state. Although the social media activists especially those from India were very adamant on the issue, any sort of support that these activists had hoped to get have disappeared with the press conference of U.S State Departments Spokesperson John Kirby who clearly said “The U.S respects the unity and territorial integrity of Pakistan and does not support independence for Balochistan”.

Not only is this a major blow for India who have lost the battle in terms of gaining support for its so called cause, it has also stepped up the uniting factor for all of Pakistan with a major superpower recognizing that Balochistan is a part of Pakistan and will always stay that way. Referring to John Kirby, he was given the question about the position that the whole of U.S took on this matter and in turn responded by stating that the U.S government respects the territorial integrity of Pakistan.

While many of the Pakistani population are elated at this news, somehow India are sympathetic and will mourn just like they always do #kashmirtyranny.  India has always been in the thick of things on social media and press claims whenever tragedy seems to befall Pakistan and anything related to destabilizing Pakistan and its forces has seen India upping the ante and coming out on top in the race for trying the hardest to break the Muslim States defenses. So far, the Balochistan plot has not gone according to plan.  Now let us wait for the onrush of the so called Balochistan activists who will definitely make a return to the platform they took when Modi first started claiming.

Read More

Pakistan's growing market

According to the recent information going in and around the equity market, Pakistan has surprisingly outperformed India and china by quite a large margin. Now people are starting to wonder why a country like Pakistan has seen so much growth in this sector and why foreign giants would want to invest here. That may come as a big surprise to some. Pakistan has been suffering all sorts of terrorist attacks, which makes it a very unstable country to put your money in. And it has been lagging behind both India and China in key macroeconomic metrics like GDP growth rates and unemployment. So the question is asked. Why is Pakistan being favored by the bigger markets compared to its neighbors?

A few things. First, terrorist attacks don’t usually affect financial markets, unless they are disruptive to trade, which hasn’t been the case in Pakistan.  Second, Pakistan is a frontier rather than an emerging market, and therefore, favored by the numbers game. Third, its market reform efforts have been getting a couple of votes of confidence from overseas like $1 billion in support from the World Bank – and a couple of domestic acquisitions from foreign suitors like the acquisition of Karachi’s K-Karachi by Shanghai Electric Power Co. This has all been music to the ears of foreign investors. 

While Pakistan’s market has been getting a couple of endorsements from overseas institutions and investors, China’s markets have been unsettled by the return of heavy handed government policies which have scared away foreign investors. And while India has stayed on course with reforms, execution is a problem.

A few words of caution: Frontier markets are highly volatile, with one year’s big winners turning into next year’s big losers. Besides, with a big run up over the last five years, most of the gains are already behind, for now.

Read More

police action or mass murder

In the history of the subcontinent, the most drama ever created was when the partition turned from a dream into a reality and two separate states namely, Pakistan and India came into existence. Following the British rule that slowly diminished, two separate countries with different mentalities and an overwhelming cultural strength were formed. Talking in the context of what really happened and why it happened, the conclusion derived from an outsiders point of view is that two major religions followed by the Muslims and Hindus could simply not co-exist which in-avertedly led to two separate states being formed. But what about the people stuck in the wrong state at the time of partition. What could a Muslim do if he was stuck in Indian borders? History leads us to believe that the Muslims were granted immigration from Indian lands into the borders of Pakistan but there is another twist into this history that not many are aware of. In the concept of partition, it was decided that the whole subcontinent would be divided into states and that each state would be free to choose whom to join, either Pakistan which was a Muslim state or India which was dominated by the Hindus.

When the decision came towards Hyderabad of whom the ruler at the time was Nizam ul Mulk Mir Osman Ali Khan more importantly a Muslim, he chose to join Pakistan as Hyderabad was in fact a Muslim region. This was the natural motive to take as it would guarantee the Muslims the right to join the Muslim state. Talks were placed and the idea soon began taking shape when word got out that a major chunk in the center of India was shifting towards becoming a Muslim state. The position can be seen in the map at the time.

When the Indian Prime Minister (Nehru) came to know of this and that this would soon be in effect, he ordered the Indian Army to seize control over Hyderabad and to stop this from happening. Documented Proof has recently been unveiled from a report by Pundit Sunderlal who was the man Nehru had sent to lead the team to discover the activities going on in Hyderabad. The report thought to have never come out in the past has now been found in the confines of the Indian government that proves that they did not want this to be found out.

The report contained instances of the actions taken by the Indian army on the inhabitants of Hyderabad. Besides the killings and murders, other methods were used to eliminate all traces of Muslim culture from Hyderabad. The first thing to be targeted was the language. Urdu, the national language was deemed something unholy and Indian languages were made the norm of the population. Teachers were given a small time period to learn the new language and Muslim employees forced to adopt the new barrier. Many Muslims were forced to swear that they were not part of any Muslim Rebellion after endless tortures while other employees were kicked out from their jobs just because of the religion they followed. The rich and wealthy Muslims managed to migrate to Pakistan and away from the carnage whereas the ones left behind faced the wrath of the Indian army and the Local police.

There were few uprisings from local Muslim Public figures such as Kasim Razvi (founder of MIM) rose to try and promote the idea that Muslims be allowed to either join Pakistan or remain independent. But after being jailed for his efforts, the Muslim opposition began living in fear. This is when the Indian army took over. The report takes us to many villages in Hyderabad where Muslim killings were the common thing and the Indian army and Local police were behind it. The property of the Islam followers were seized. Muslim adult males were taken out in public and massacred. Firearms were taken away from the Muslims while Hindus were left alone. Muslim shops and houses were getting robbed and the women getting shamed and brutally murdered. And what was worse, that the Army encouraged the local Hindus to join in the rioting against the Muslim’s and took the area under siege.

Rotting corpses and burnt bones were the norm in Hyderabad in the late months of 1948. It is of no doubt to whom these bodies belonged. A total amount of around 40,000 Muslim killings were stated in the report whereas the Indians claimed it as a police action with minimal casualties due to the rioting by the Muslims. Since slaughtering forty thousand people including women and children was in the Indian Governments claims to be for the annexation of Hyderabad, why was the report being hidden. This leads to a lot of other questions being raised against the Indian Government as to why such an action was taken against vulnerable Muslims and why it was kept secret for so long.

Read More

FORGOTTEN PROMISES & DEFUNCT DOGMAS: - IS KASHMIR BEING PUSHED TO AN ARMED STRUGGLE?

     “Absence of International Collective Conscience Is What Breeds Armed Struggles”

                                                                                                                          Che Guevara

Popular Uprising, Public Revolt or National Mutiny, there many words found in the English Language for a phenomenon more commonly referred to as an Armed Struggle. Armed Struggle is a Movement Supplemented by Violence and undertaken by a National Entity for the achievement of defined Political Objectives. Though romanticized in pieces of fine literature, armed struggles have and will always continue to be a matter of grave concern for students of Peace and Conflict Studies. Armed struggles throughout the course of history and even in recent times have served as catalysts to chain of disorder, rampage and violence which have adequate potential of invoking prospects of a Civil War. Irish Republican Movement and or The Angola National Campaign are manifestations of how Justifiable movements turned in Mass Humanitarian Tragedies. Armed Struggles thus no matter how legitimate are discouraged by previews of Strategic Studies and the only productive measure that can be undertaken in this regard is the engagement of international community in general and power-players in particular with issues related to Self Determination and Identity Crisis. It is however appalling to see that the ultimate Preacher of Democracy and Justice has decided to shy away from a brewing crisis that is unfolding as we speak. Will this disengagement provide Raison D’être for an Armed Struggle?

Four Day Visit of the U.S Secretary of State Mr. John Forbes Kerry to India has just concluded on the 1^st day of September 2016. The significance and impact of this visit was already anticipated and many in the region as well as in the rest of the world were looking forward to it. Many of these onlookers belonged either to the Defense Contractors Club who were high up on their heels peeking into the Money Mint this visit could have ignited or to the Diplomatic/Academic circles observing strategic alignment in South-Asia. Without doubt this is the audience that was catered the most by the press and held in high esteem. However as cigars were being smoked and wine glasses being toasted in these elitist circles, far away from the Lutyens of Delhi in a God Forsaken Valley called Kashmir, another group of onlookers was also anxious about this visit. Hundreds of Thousands of Assaulted, Abused, Oppressed and Subjugated Children of a Lesser God were also trying their best to look on to this visit with their Pellet Ridden Eyes. These misfortune Kashmiris as we know them have been subject of abhorrent state brutalities for the past 2 months. Dozens have fallen to Indiscriminate Firing by Indian Security Forces, Hundreds including children have suffered Permanent Visual Disabilities due to the use of Pellet Guns by LEAs and Thousands have suffered Harrowing Torture when they were found violating the terms curfew due to immediate needs. 

These people and many more that care for them had their Eyes Locked at the Secretary of State’s Visit as they hoped that the ultimate custodian of Human Rights and Civil Liberties in this unipolar world would care for them. If not in a position to Restrain India from its wrongdoings or even Reprimand it The Secretary of State was at least expected to pay a lip service by expressing regret over the Loss of Life in Kashmir. Expectations of the distressed were high as they hoped that even an expression of Sorrow and Regret would placate them and heal their wounds to some extent but all these hopes were in vain. The Secretary of State found enough time for Sightseeing in the Suburbs of Delhi as he Visited Temples and Collected Artifacts but he could not find enough time to acknowledge or comment upon the tyranny that exists in the valley. It is difficult as to say whether the Secretary of State found himself Short of Time or SHORT OF COURAGE but this visit has left deep scars in the valley. It seems as if human rights and fundamental liberties are Meant Not for the inhabitants of Kashmir, what await them is further Oppression, Torture, Enforced Disappearances and Mass Graves. Franklin Roosevelt the 32^nd President of the United States had famously said “Never Again” while responding to the Holocaust, this promise has gained further significance in the post-cold war transformation of the world into a unipolar entity.

 Many today across the globe look up to This Promise but it seems as if Uncle Sam has either Forgotten these boastful words or Lost Some Calcium in His Back Bone. The United States of America either due to the Shine of the Indian Capital Market or due to Vested Interests has in the recent past began to shy away from its responsibilities as a Super-Power in the New World Order. Let alone stand for the millions of oppressed Kashmiris U.S has also restricted its self from Acknowledging the International Status of the Kashmir Dispute which is Supplemented by Several U.N Resolutions. Kashmiris have been watching these Shades of American Diplomacy quite minutely yet they thought that Hundreds of Deaths would awake the long Dozing American Conscience. This visit however seems to have out the Final Nail in the Coffin. It has certainly conveyed to the Kashmiris the message that their Policy of Political Struggle and Endurance of Oppression is yielding No Results as their Shrieks and Cries fall on Deaf Ears. Adaptation of an Alternate Path of Struggle is thus the call of the hour.

 Its seems as if Kashmiris have Reached the Bank of the ferocious River Slavery where they would either have to Jump into it and drown till eternity Without Any Hope of Rescue or build a Bridge of Armed Struggle and cross it by the strength of their backs and the sweat of their brows, to the other side where the every lovely Freedom awaits them. This struggle if undertaken will surely inflict unimaginable pain and sufferings as a Wave of Violence would inevitably erupt. The decision rests with Kashmiris alone regarding the path they chose. The Secretary of States and his office is however advised to refrain from issuing any statements condemning violence if Kashmiris adopt the later path because the United States of America has lost the Moral Authority to do so.

Read More