Pages

Monday 26 September 2016

PAK v IND dying out

Threats have come from India’s side that they are planning a war against Pakistan for the so called planned attack on Uri base this September by Pakistani militants according to India. The Indians claimed and gave a knee jerk reaction even while the base was under attack that it must be Pakistan who sent these agents into battle to weaken the Indian forces. Firstly, as documented and reported by a retired Indian major, India had placed around 300,000 army troops placed at the line of control. So for four militants to cross undetected through to the Indian side from Pakistan is a huge slap across the face of the Indians themselves who pride their army for being one of the world’s best. India might have calmed down on wanting an outright war since no actual evidence has come forth that Pakistan were the ones behind the attack and since they have no real proof on this notion, they have backed off somewhat on their need for a war especially with both powers being nuclear capable and having a huge ammunition on their hands.
Pakistan on the other hand never wanted a war but a trend as started by youths and social activists in Pakistan showed the Indians that Pakistan were going to be no easy pushovers due to everyone getting ready to fight for its safety. This was so much widespread and the trend flamed into such a huge number that even PM of India, Modi changed the stance of the overall country by stating that India will not go for an all-out war but would rather do it through stopping the water and trying to spread unrest in Pakistan through social media.

Besides the uprising of the Pakistani fightback on social media, many Pakistani leaders are also chiming up the retaliation on their press releases and conferences. Jamaat-e-Islami Chief Sirajul Haq said on Saturday that India is creating war hysteria to divert the world’s attention from its atrocities in Kashmir but also added that in case of war, New Delhi would face a Pakistan which is a thousand times stronger than it was in 1965.

0 comments:

Post a Comment