forceful takeover

All we see on the media these days is how Pakistan occupied Balochistan forcefully or how Pakistan has no right over Kashmir and every other post from Indian media targets the fact that Pakistani are basically abusing their rights to capture other states that do not want to be a part of them. They have the following things to base this on. They think that the ruler of the state does not want this. This is not the case in POK, neither was it in Balochistan. They think the people are unhappy with Pakistani treatment on their area. Neither the Balochi people come forward in hopes to extract some sort of revenge against Pakistan nor is the only thing Pakistani Kashmiris feel about the government when it will stop the Indian army from destroying their lives.

But if India really does want to fight this game, then Pakistan has a few options it can use as well. Junagarh,Jodhpur, Jaisalmer, rajahs tan and not to mention Hyderabad are all examples of what India claims went wrong with Balochistan. All four of the above mentioned states do not make the total princely states that wanted nothing to do with India but were forced to do so by the Indian Army. With Muslim leaders or Muslim majority, each of these states were adamant on joining with Pakistan or staying independent but by no means whatsoever being a part of India. But India did not have the intention of letting any state with potential go to Pakistan or away from its grasp. They quickly pounced on it and tried to dominate and force the residents and rulers to either succumb to the pressure or kill them in the process. Most of the times, Muslim lives were at stake with 90% of the deaths in these forceful take overs being Muslims. And these days, India is trying ever so hard to take over Kashmir using brute force. More than 80 Muslims have perished from what is called police action. 80 lives are not a small matter are they?